Blogs > Gordon: My Back Pages

Gordon Glantz is the managing editor of the Times Herald and an award winning columnist.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Only Time Will Tell

His name was Randall.

Of all the pets I've loved before, none will take his place.

For those of you unfamiliar with this well-told tale, I adopted this black lab mix off death row at the Philadelphia SPCA with a mere 10 minutes to spare in December of 1990.

His life in the six months before the arriving at the shelter was on the mean streets. He came into their care with bruises that had yet to fully heal when I took him home.

He lived always ready to defend himself, or those of us in his pack, but willing to show the unconditional love that made him -- like many dogs -- special.

If he had not been gathered up and brought into the shelter by ambulance, a likely fate would have been as a bait dog for those who somehow justify their existence by raising fighting dogs.

For all I know, that may have already been the case and he had escaped.

Regardless, he didn't have to worry about all that anymore. Until he passed away at the age of 16 1/2 (really, really old for a dog), he was treated like the prince he was.

Naming him Randall was a natural. Randall Cunningham, in 1990, was in the midst of his best season with my beloved Eagles.

It was the start of a tradition of naming pets, canine or feline, after Eagles' quarterbacks.

I never thought there would ever be a bitter irony in that.

Now, as I find myself faced with a moral dilemma, the irony is so sick and twisted that I'm locked in moral wresling match.

The Eagles -- in whom I've invested time, money, emotion and devotion -- have signed disgraced quarterback Michael Vick, whose name was once synonymous with overpaid superstar and is now better known as the athlete who recklessly oversaw a deadly dog-fighting ring from his pocket pager and cell phone and, from time to time, in person.

That tricky term "moral dilemma" is one I've used before, but now I realize it was with the reckless disregard of a preteen skateboarder zigging and zagging through crosstown traffic at rush hour.

I don't know if I have truly been met with one.

Last summer, with the not-so-subtle urging of hospital personnel unimpressed with the fine print in my father's insurance policy, we were faced with the decision of keeping him alive for a while with no quality of life or opting for "comfort care."

Fortunately, my father was lucid enough to make his decision.

But that was more of a head-versus-heart scenario anyway.

When our long-held moral stances are put to the test, the game changes.

Decisions that are out of our hands leave us with toughest choices.

It was just the other day, while catching up with someone from high school on Facebook, I joked that my personal Holy Trinity -- not counting family, of course -- consisted of Bruce Springsteen, "The Sopranos" and the Eagles.

But what if Bruce Springsteen suddenly donned a Hitler mustache, a swastika and starting goose-stepping around the stage?

What if it was revealed that the makers of "The Sopranos" were mocking us with their scripts?

And what if the Eagles -- so desperate to bring hard-core, long-suffering fans like myself that elusive Super Bowl crown -- signed a person whose inhuman and illegal treatment of animals made him less than human in my eyes?

I have a deep love for animals that began well before Randall's adoption during the first week I was "on my own" in the world.

My wife and I have already begun sharing that with our 2 1/2-year-old daughter, Sofia, taking her to zoos and reserves whenever possible. She sleeps with a growing collection of stuffed animals.

She will surely carry the torch for us, as she already has a special bond with our two cats -- Donovan (as in McNabb) and Ty (as in Detmer).

Randall died before she was born, but his spirit lives in a house that remains open to four-legged creatures with tails.

It's also a house where our schedule from September to Super Bowl Sunday revolves around the Eagles.

But what kind of example will I be setting as a diehard Eagles' fan yelling to put Vick in the game to ignite the offense?

If I could give you an answer now, I'd only be lying.

I get pretty emotional once my game face is on.

It's all or nothing at all.

I had a dog like that, too.

His name was Randall.

Of all the pets I've loved before, none will take his place.

24 Comments:

Blogger Linda said...

Gordon, I'm not quite sure where you stand on this issue, but as an animal lover you must be feeling as betrayed by the Eagles organization as I am. Vick should never be allowed to play again. There is something seriously wrong with a person that can do what he did to those dogs. Come on Eagles, you can do better!

August 14, 2009 at 7:10 AM 
Anonymous Ina said...

Gordon, your first obligation is to be a man and a father and show your daughter what's right. Being a fan comes second.

August 14, 2009 at 8:37 AM 
Anonymous Michael said...

Linda, I think Gordon feels like I do about this. It's hard to take an immediate stand. I don't know if fans should feel betrayed because the team is trying to win a championship for us. At the same time, at what lengths will they go? Pro sports are out of control.

August 14, 2009 at 8:42 AM 
Anonymous Reed said...

All is forgiven when you can run fast and throw hard. The main question is how repentant the man is in his soul. My guess would be that he thinks deep down that he was overpunished for his sins because of who he is or some such nonsense. The Eagles are just playing the game under the rules as they are written.

August 14, 2009 at 8:50 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If was involved in an illegal human fighting ring in back alleys, no body would care. Everyone is so goofy aboout there animals.

August 14, 2009 at 10:02 AM 
Anonymous Young Yeller said...

The whole thing is crazy!

August 14, 2009 at 10:12 AM 
Blogger Rebecca said...

Goofy about their animals -- yeah, I don't understand why people would have a problem with someone electrocuting, drowning and hanging dogs for sport. There's nothing wrong with enjoying tormenting defenseless creatures if you can play football. What a fine role model Vick will be to children. I am glad he represents the Philadelphia Eagles -- NOT!

August 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

See what I mean - goofy about Goofy!!!

August 14, 2009 at 1:47 PM 
Anonymous Fast Eddie said...

Gordy, I forgot you were a John Kerry guy.
Flip-flop. Flip-flop. Flip-flop. Flip-flop.

August 14, 2009 at 1:51 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How many years did it take for this Football Player, with much talent, to see it was wrong to treat any animal the way he did? He served time? Yes, but it does show one thing, he has no respect for anyone or any animal. The fact is he is out of cash. A few years in the slammer can not change a life long mannerism developed with associating with the wrong crowd.
Maybe he should donate his time for one full year or be paid minimum wage. Then we will judge this player.

August 14, 2009 at 3:55 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Similarities and Differences


Jeff Lurie

Employs specially trained and sometimes chemically enhanced beings to tear each other apart for 8 Sundays during the fall. He gets the enjoyment from a rabid fan base that will come to pay for it in taxpayer funded stadiums.


Michael Vick

Employed specially trained and sometimes chemically enhanced beings to tear each other apart. He gets jail time…



Hmmmm…..

August 14, 2009 at 6:12 PM 
Blogger tlees2 said...

It comes down to this - does Michael Vick deserve a second chance, or was what he did so awful that even though he has served time in prison the Eagles should not have signed him?

August 14, 2009 at 7:30 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gordon, I liked your story but what do you really think about this scum bag wearing eagles green. I will be blunt, the Eagles are no better than the scum bag they signed. I think Vick sucks as a QB he will not make a difference in the outcome of the season. But more importantly he should be shunned by decent society. I think Mike Vick should be tortured the same way the dogs were and if he survives then I think he will be rehabilitated. This animal does not belong in professional sports. As a long time Eagles fan I will be wearing Steelers colors this year.

August 15, 2009 at 12:58 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Remember the last time McNabb was a lobbyist for a guy with baggage to come here?

August 15, 2009 at 10:05 PM 
Anonymous Eric said...

Yeah, anon, I do remember what happened when they got T.O. They went to the Super Bowl!

August 16, 2009 at 9:35 AM 
Anonymous Leon said...

What the H does TO have to do with Michael Vick???

August 16, 2009 at 10:50 AM 
Anonymous My oh my said...

Gordon,

Nice to see to writing about something almost relevant again. Interesting column today. And true. Even Phillies games are nasty these days,

August 16, 2009 at 2:28 PM 
Anonymous Up 2 Par said...

I disagree Leon. The whole T.O. saga set this thing up because they still regret letting T.O. go so now they have a new approach toward bad boyz.

August 17, 2009 at 7:24 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Run them ragged, stab them to weaken them and then kill(But sometimes slowly) them with a sword thrust while thousands cheer. Bad, bad but that's bull fighting. Is there really a difference?

August 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM 
Anonymous Kevin Kolb said...

What about me?

August 18, 2009 at 8:23 AM 
Anonymous Jeff Garcia said...

Start packing those bags Kevin. Donovan doesn't want you around. I know how feels. You are a threat to him. Goodbye and good luck, bro.

August 18, 2009 at 9:40 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think people need to sit back and let the guy prove himself. What ever happened to forgiving? You don't exactly have to forget, but AGAIN, Michael Vick did his time, AND the ASPCA is RESERVING judgment at this time. However, peta, who invited MV to go to their so-called "class", which they said he did take, turned on him anyway! These are the same people who say "fish are intelligent, you can tell by looking into their eyes". They don't want to discuss differences or agree to disagree. I tried to give peta my opinion, but they banned me and erased my posts even though there were no inappropriate words posted. I don't like what MV was responsible for, but where was everyone when Floyd Brossaud was arrested? 70 years old, godfather of dogfighting pitbull sales was arrested in 2005, yet I didn't see anything in papers or on the internet about that. I did research, since the stereotyping was out again, about Black people originating the pitbull fighting. Well, look it up: http://www.unchainyourdog.org/news/050607LABust.htm

And, where was the outrage after Katrina, when an outfit took in people's pets and got government $, only to neglect those pets. In both cases, the pictures were horrific!

http://www.dogsbite.org/blog/2009/02/katrina-rescue-fraud-dogs-hijacked-by.html

And, look up the history of pitbull fighting.

Until 400 AD, the popularity of the breed significantly spread throughout the Roman Empire as fighting dogs. During this period, the breed mixed with other European dog breeds that have caused the creation of another type- the bulldog breed. This is the direct antecedent of the American Pitbull Terriers or what is better known as the Pitbull dogs.

But this cruel sport did not end with the decent of the Roman Empire from power. When the Normans invaded England in the early 11th century, the game of baiting was introduced.

Interestingly, this game originated with the Bullenbeisser, another dog breed that were employed by meat butchers to handle much larger bulls for slaughter in the market. The principle of this sport is when the bulls show uncontrollable behavior, the dog will bite on the nose of the bull and hold tight to them, unless the handler gained control over the animals.

And cock fighting, which was only recently outlawed in LA! (In the United States, cockfighting is illegal in all 50 U.S. states and Washington, D.C.. The last state to implement a state law banning cockfighting was Louisiana; the Louisiana State Legislature voted to approve a Louisiana ban in June 2007.[24] The ban took effect in August 2008.)

Again, I don't believe in animal abuse, but there are a lot of people that weren't raised right, and it isn't just MV. So, people need to sit back and not take it so personal. Football is a BUSINESS! Plain and simple. Just like baseball, golf, etc. So, if you want to be unforgiving, then you are just like all the others who can't give a person who made a mistake, committed a crime, etc., a second chance. Well, to those who can't, I wonder how you can go to Church with that attitude.

August 18, 2009 at 5:07 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice try Gordon, but we all know you are a coward. You talk a good game, but the first time Vick scores a TD you will be jumping up and down like a cheerleader. Your beloved Eagles are more important to you than anything this world has to offer. Sad, but true.

August 21, 2009 at 9:36 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Nice try Gordon, but we all know you are a coward.

-----------

Says the coward hiding behind his/her/its computer screen...

September 16, 2009 at 9:36 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home