Blogs > Gordon: My Back Pages

Gordon Glantz is the managing editor of the Times Herald and an award winning columnist.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

From Me To You

As a public service to our letter to the editor writers, I would like to pass along the following tips to help you get your letter published:

1) The "official" limit is 350 words. I may let you slide at 355 (keep that between us), but not 432.

2) Your point can be made without USING ALL CAPS, exclamation points (!) and bold letters. And if you really overdo it with both, then I'M REALLY GONNA PUT YOUR LETTER ON THE BOTTOM OF THE PILE OR ACCIDENTALLY-ON-PURPOSE DELETE IT!!!!!!

3) You also must include your full name and your hometown. If you want to be more anonymous, I would suggest you vent through our Your 2 Cents line or comment on our blogs or website.

4) Keep in mind that letters to the editor are to the editor, and pass through his desk first. I'm the managing editor whose responsibilities include the opinion page (where letters to the editor are printed).

5) We are under no obligation, legally, to run your letter. If you don't see it, maybe you are not in accordance with one of the issues raised here. That said, I'd love nothing more than to have a plethora of letters at my disposal.

6) One thing that will keep your letter out of the mix is libeling someone else in print. Even though it is not us doing the writing, we cannot allow you to do it. So back up any facts. You can't just call someone, particularly one who is not a public figure, a liar without explaining the wherefore and whys of their alleged lies.

7) A lot of you write about angst over tax increases and other financial concerns. Please make sure your math is accurate, and don't use the % sign. Please, write out the word "percent."

Lastly, before I move you to some helpful basic writing hints and tips that will keep our editors sane and your letter on the page after I place it there, your fast track to getting published would be to hit us during dry spells. If you see stretches of days with only one letter — or Today in History in place of where the letters run on Page A4 — it's a good time to get something in to us.

And now, the following from Kaboodle.com:

10 Common Errors “Spell Check” Won’t Catch


While we can rely on a spell checker to catch glaring errors, a computer can’t pick up on all careless mistakes, especially if the word could be correct in a different context. Often word misuse is our mistake. The English language is full of homonyms, or words that have different meanings but sound and look similar, which makes it easy to confuse proper usage. For instance, verbally, you might not even notice the difference between “your” and “you’re.” But in print, the error can lead the reader to perceive you as less intelligent than you are. For this reason, it's important to spell check and proofread your documents, especially for the following common misuses, which are so easy to make, you might even have to check your document a couple times to catch them.


Its versus It’s (and all other apostrophes):

According to a copy editing instructor for California-based copy editing service provider Edicetera, confusing “its” and “it’s” is the most common error in the English language. That one minuscule apostrophe (or lack thereof) drastically changes the meaning of the entire sentence. “It’s” is a contraction of “it is,” whereas “its” refers to possession. Also, watch out for “your” versus “you’re.”


Sales versus Sails
Can you imagine writing on your resume that you “increased sails by 20 percent”?! Unless you’re applying to a job for a sail boat manufacturer, this careless mistake will probably get your resume sailing right into the recycling bin.

Affect versus Effect
There is a lot of confusion around this one but here’s the rule: “Affect” is a verb and “effect” is a noun. It’s as simple as that.


Would Have NOT Would of

The subtlety in pronunciation leads to the rampant misuse of this phrase; however “would of” is never correct and may make you appear as if you are not well-read.

Through versus Threw
“He threw the ball through the window.” “Threw” is a verb and “through” is a preposition. And speaking of “through,” be careful to make sure you don’t actually mean “thorough” or vice versa. The slight variation in spelling will not be picked up by a computer, but writing “I am through” when you mean “I am thorough” is quite ironic, don’t you think?

Then versus Than
Six is more than five; after five then comes six. “Than” refers to a comparison, while “then” refers to a subsequent event.

Supposed To NOT Suppose To
“Suppose” is a verb, meaning to think or to ponder. The correct way to express a duty is to write, “I was supposed to…”

Wonder versus Wander
You can wander around while you wonder why “wander” and “wonder” have such different meanings, yet sound oh so similar.

Their versus There versus They’re
OK, once and for all: “Their” is possessive; “there” refers to distance; and “they’re” is a contraction of “they are.”

Farther versus Further
While both words refer to distance, grammarians distinguish “farther” as physical distance and “further” as metaphorical distance. You can dive further into a project, for instance, or you can dive farther into the ocean.

7 Comments:

Anonymous Patricia said...

Geez, with all those rules and regulations I may as well not even bother!!!

July 22, 2010 at 11:52 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Need to be Anonymous because of a crazy ex, but your co-worker, Stan, censors stuff even if it is not bad language. So, I don't bother posting on his blog that is connected to the paper. Might as well be in China, North Korea, Iran, etc.

July 22, 2010 at 4:47 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I heard that about Stan, too, and it is a deterrant to being part of the TH dialague. The word on the street is that Gordo, despite being steadfast in his views, is more a student of the First Amendment than is his so called superior officer.

July 23, 2010 at 7:23 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting, now we all know. If you censor all letters sent in to the TH - why would any person in their right mind even consider writing one? As for comments on the various Blogs, they are interesting and errors make it even more so. Now that's a Fact!

July 25, 2010 at 4:11 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Errors make it so? There is always Factcheck and Snopes. I use them all the time.

July 27, 2010 at 11:24 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

GOP Lawmaker Slips Up, Admits Tax Cuts Will ‘Increase The Debt’

At the end of the year, President Bush’s tax cuts are set to expire. President Obama and many Democrats in Congress favor extending those tax cuts for the middle class. But Republicans — seemingly not worried about the $700 billion cost — want tax cuts for the rich included as well.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) seems to be one of those Republicans. But when C-Span host Steve Scully asked the California Republican about the tax cuts issue on Washington Journal this morning, Nunes went slightly off message:

SCULLY: Tax cuts, do they increase the debt or do they spur economic growth?

NUNES: Well, I think that they increase the debt. If you let them expire at the end of the year we’re going to have a huge, the largest tax increase in American history.

Nunes drifted back on message later, saying that the deficit is “going to grow” if all the Bush tax cuts expire. But when asked why, he couldn’t provide any specifics. “Because it’s going to throw the economy into a tailspin,” he said.

Nunes is right about one thing: Tax cuts do increase the debt, but he’s dead wrong in claiming that they reduce the deficit. In fact, as the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities pointed out, the Bush tax cuts will cause $3.4 trillion in deficits between 2009 and 2019 while the “debt-service costs caused by the Bush-era tax cuts, amount[] to more than $200 billion through 2008 and another $1.7 trillion over the 2009-2019 period — over $330 billion in 2019 alone.”

Moreover, the Washington Post’s Ezra Klein has noted just how the federal debt will skyrocket if the Bush tax cuts are extended as opposed to allowed to expire:



“If they’re willing to let the tax cuts expire,” Klein writes, “it’s good evidence that they’re serious about cutting the debt. If they’re not willing to let the cuts expire, it’s irrefutable evidence that they’re not.”

July 29, 2010 at 9:17 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

From me to you... Don't buy Season Tickets for the Eagles...Do get a great TV to watch them play and your daughter will love you for that and you can turn the game off and we will not see you on the Surekill.

August 8, 2010 at 10:18 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home